CASE COMMENTS: INTERNATIONAL POLICY - REGULATORY - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - ESSENTIAL FACILITIES - LEVERAGE EFFECTS

United States of America: The US Supreme Court rules on the current relationhip between antitrust law and sectoral regulation in the telecommunications sector (Trinko)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On January 13, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision entitled Verizon Communications Inc. V. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko LLP, to which American commentators refer, mentioning only the name of the plaintiff, Trinko. This Trinko decision is considered in the United States by some observers to be one of the major decisions of the Supreme Court (see T. LIPSKI, L'arrêt Verizon Communications/Trinko et l'avenir des relations des autorités de concurrence US/UE , Global Competition Highlights, Bull. Latham & Watkins, n° 3, 04/2004). The judgment clarifies some of the conditions for the implementation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act relating

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Frédérique Daudret-John, François Souty, United States of America: The US Supreme Court rules on the current relationhip between antitrust law and sectoral regulation in the telecommunications sector (Trinko), 13 January 2004, Concurrences N° 1-2004, Art. N° 1603, pp. 97-102

Visites 7015

All reviews