CASE COMMENT: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION - DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES

Discriminatory practices: The Paris Court of Appeal confirms the decision of the French Competition Authority which had declared unfounded the allegations of abuse of dominant position formulated by a television magazine editing company which considered that the distribution prices applied to its company were discriminatory compared to those applied to its main competitor (NMPP)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Cour d’Appel de Paris,1ère Chambre - Section H, ARRÊT DU 17 SEPTEMBRE 2008 relatif à la décision n° 07-D-23 rendue le 12 juillet 2007 par le Conseil de la Concurrence

On verra encore l'arrêt rendu dans l'affaire opposant la société éditrice du magazine de télévision Télé Z à la société Nouvelles messageries de la presse parisienne (NMPP). On se souvient que l'éditeur de Télé Z dénonçait des pratiques discriminatoires, par rapport

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)
    France 3636 contributions 586972 visits

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Discriminatory practices: The Paris Court of Appeal confirms the decision of the French Competition Authority which had declared unfounded the allegations of abuse of dominant position formulated by a television magazine editing company which considered that the distribution prices applied to its company were discriminatory compared to those applied to its main competitor (NMPP), 12 July 2008, Concurrences Review N° 4-2008, Art. N° 64058, www.concurrences.com

Visites 60

All reviews