Search results - Concurrences

21 Nov 2018

Opening remarks (10 years of the Anti-Monopoly Law in China - Beijing, 14 July 2018)

Hanhong Wu • N° 4-2018

This paper reviews the major achievements since the implementation of China’s antimonopoly policy. The paper demonstrates that the implementation of antimonopoly law promoted the formation of a market system and improvement of market system. The role of China’s anti-monopoly policy in building a (...)

21 Nov 2018

Merger control (10 years of the Anti-Monopoly Law in China - Beijing, 14 July 2018)

Shan Jiao, Wei Tan, Ying Qin • N° 4-2018

These papers review the use of FRAND commitment as merger remedy and the risks of Un-notified Concentrations in China. The paper looks at the economic meaning of FRAND price after the merger, the potential abuse of FRAND commitment and the implication of these remedies. By the end of this (...)

21 Nov 2018

Anti-competitive agreement and abusive conduct (10 years of the Anti-Monopoly Law in China - Beijing, 14 July 2018)

Alastair Mordaunt, Hazel Yin, Kailun Ji, Ninette Dodoo, Tracy Lu • N° 4-2018

Cartels have been an enforcement priority in China since the Anti-Monopoly Law entered into force on 1 August 2008. Notwithstanding this focus on cartel enforcement, the authorities have, over time, expanded into other areas of potential anti-competitive conduct between competitors such as (...)

21 Nov 2018

IP and antitrust litigation (10 years of the Anti-Monopoly Law in China - Beijing, 14 July 2018)

Guanbin Xie, Li Zhu, Xuting Wu • N° 4-2018

In April 2017, Beijing High Court issued its Guidelines on the Ruling of Patent Infringements and one year later, Guangdong High Court issued its Guidelines for the Trial of SEP Disputes (for trial implementation) on 26 April 2018. Both of these Guidelines tried to resolve the SEP-related (...)

21 Nov 2018

Round table (10 years of the Anti-Monopoly Law in China - Beijing, 14 July 2018)

Alastair Mordaunt, Hazel Yin, Janet Wang, Ming Shang, Ninette Dodoo • N° 4-2018

Over the past ten years, China has quickly established itself as one of the world’s three major antitrust regimes alongside the European Union and the United States, impacting international business activities with its active merger control regime, antitrust investigations resulting in (...)

1 Nov 2018

Introduction (10 years of the Anti-Monopoly Law in China - Beijing, 14 July 2018)

Hanhong Wu, Wei Tan • N° 4-2018

The article below introduces 9 articles related to the conference "10 years of Anti-Monopoly Law in China" held in Beijing on July 14, 2018 and published in this issue of Concurrences N°4-2018. Introduction Wei Tan Managing Director, Mingde Economic Research Inc., Washington, D.C Hanhong Wu (...)

1 Sep 2018

Dominance and monopolization: EU vs. US? (New Frontiers of Antitrust - Paris, 11 June 2018)

Alan Ryan, Jorge Padilla • N° 3-2018

These notes discuss why competition law enforcement differs across jurisdictions and consider whether such a divergence is justified. They conclude that it is insofar as differences in policy reflect differences in the underlying economy or differences in policy preferences. But they should be (...)

1^er sept. 2018

Urgence et concurrence : Mesures provisoires, référés-suspension… Toujours trop tard ? (Demain la concurrence - Paris, 11 Juin 2018)

Laurence Idot • N° 3-2018

Après un alignement du droit français sur le droit communautaire, les deux droits ont évolué de manière différente. Le sujet est de nouveau au cœur de l’actualité à la suite de la première affaire Google, mais surtout de la proposition ECN +, qui prévoit que toutes les ANC doivent disposer de cet outil. (...)

1 Sep 2018

Mergers and gun jumping: What are companies actually allowed to do? (New Frontiers of Antitrust - Paris, 11 June 2018)

Antoine Winckler • N° 3-2018

Gun jumping has come to the forefront of antitrust enforcement in a number of important jurisdictions, including the European Union and France.  A consensus has emerged, particularly regarding infringements resulting from the acquisition of control through shares and voting rights and the central (...)

1^er sept. 2018

Urgence et concurrence : Mesures provisoires, référés-suspension… Toujours trop tard ? (Demain la concurrence - Paris, 11 Juin 2018)

Laurence Idot • N° 3-2018

Après un alignement du droit français sur le droit communautaire, les deux droits ont évolué de manière différente. Le sujet est de nouveau au cœur de l’actualité à la suite de la première affaire Google, mais surtout de la proposition ECN +, qui prévoit que toutes les ANC doivent disposer de cet outil. (...)

1 Sep 2018

Online distribution: Are the rules now set? (New Frontiers of Antitrust - Paris, 11 June 2018)

Mark Powell • N° 3-2018

The steady growth of e-commerce continues to change the competitive landscape in which traditional bricks-and-mortar retailers operate. It is undeniable that this rapid growth is putting immense pressure on traditional retailers. Competition policies may have unwittingly accentuated the crisis (...)

1^er févr. 2018

Algorithmes et concurrence (Paris, 6 juin 2017)

Serge Abiteboul, Thierry Pénard • N° 1-2018

L’informatique a profondément transformé le commerce. Cette transformation s’est accompagnée d’immenses promesses mais également de risques considérables. Il est évidemment aussi faux de croire à toutes ces promesses que de se persuader de l’inévitabilité de tous ces risques. Dans cet article, nous (...)

1 Nov 2017

State aid control and tax rulings. Is there really a competition issue? (New Frontiers of Antitrust - Paris, 26 June 2017)

Damien Neven • N° 4-2017

This article argues that there is no presumption that tax rulings distort competition between firms. Rather, tax rulings should be considered, in the same way as subsidy races, as detrimental to the achievement in the internal market. Finally, we argue that the in the presence of complex (...)

1^er nov. 2017

Innovation et concurrence : Les concentrations favorisent-elles l’innovation ? (New Frontiers of Antitrust - Paris, 26 June 2017)

Isabelle de Silva, Justus Haucap • N° 4-2017

La question de savoir comment les concentrations altèrent l’innovation a acquis de l’importance dans un certain nombre de fusions récentes. Tenir compte des effets probables des fusions sur l’innovation est cependant difficile pour un certain nombre de raisons. D’abord, la relation entre la (...)

1^er nov. 2017

Autorités de concurrence : Vers des autorités plus indépendantes et plus fortes ? (New Frontiers of Antitrust - Paris, 26 June 2017)

Eric Barbier de la Serre, José María Marín-Quemada, Laurence Idot • N° 4-2017

L’indépendance et la transparence vont de pair et sont de la plus haute importance pour les autorités de concurrence. La transparence est une garantie d’indépendance. Par définition, les autorités de concurrence doivent être indépendantes à la fois du secteur public et du secteur privé. L’indépendance (...)

1 Nov 2017

Opening (New Frontiers of Antitrust - Paris, 26 June 2017)

Marc van der Woude • N° 4-2017

In 2015 the legislator decided that the number of judges at the General Court be doubled in three successive steps so as to allow it to face its increasing workload and to rule within a reasonable delay. This contribution briefly explains which measures the General Court adopted to implement (...)

1 Sep 2017

Introductory remarks (Implementation of the EU Damages Directive into Member State law - Würzburg, May 5, 2017)

Florian Bien • N° 3-2017

1. As of June 2017, the majority of the EU Member States have implemented the EU Directive on Private Damages Actions (2014/104/EU). In doing so, the national legislators bring the sustained efforts of the Commission, namely to foster the private enforcement of EU competition law to a (...)

1 Sep 2017

Private damages actions before and after the implementation of the Directive (Implementation of the EU Damages Directive into Member State law - Würzburg, May 5, 2017)

Cristoforo Osti, Florian Bien, Florian Wagner-von Papp, Frank Kroes, Laurence Idot • N° 3-2017

The majority of Member States have implemented the European Directive on Private Damages Actions for Breach of Competition Law, into their respective law, albeit with some delay. In particular, England, Germany, and the Netherlands, but also France and Italy have faced a certain number of (...)

1 Sep 2017

Disclosure of documents that lie in the control of the parties (Implementation of the EU Damages Directive into Member State law - Würzburg, May 5, 2017)

Florian Wagner-von Papp, Frank Kroes, Jochen Bernhard, Laurence Idot, Marcella Negri • N° 3-2017

Article 5 of the Damages Directive requires Member States to enable courts to order disclosure of evidence under certain qualifying conditions, while protecting the rights of parties and third parties, in particular confidential information. This is an area in which common law jurisdictions and (...)

1 Sep 2017

Disclosure of evidence included in the file of a competition authority (Implementation of the EU Damages Directive into Member State law - Würzburg, May 5, 2017)

Alex Petrasincu, Cristoforo Osti, Florian Wagner-von Papp, Frank Kroes, Laurence Idot • N° 3-2017

The disclosure provisions of the EU Damages Directive allow national courts to order competition authorities to disclose certain documents and information in damages proceedings. In addition, private parties can also be ordered to disclose certain evidence that they have obtained through access (...)

1 Sep 2017

Binding effect of decisions of national authorities (Implementation of the EU Damages Directive into Member State law - Würzburg, May 5, 2017)

Catherine Prieto, Florian Wagner-von Papp, Frank Kroes, Jens-Uwe Franck, Marcella Negri • N° 3-2017

Article 9 of the Damages Directive requires Member States to ensure that an infringement of competition law found by a final decision of a national competition authority is deemed to be irrefutably established for the purposes of an action for damages brought before their national courts. While (...)

1 Sep 2017

Limitation periods (Implementation of the EU Damages Directive into Member State law - Würzburg, May 5, 2017)

Catherine Prieto, Florian Wagner-von Papp, Frank Kroes, Marcella Negri, Oliver Remien • N° 3-2017

Limitation periods could imperil the enforcement of competition damage claims and in the footsteps of the Manfredi case of the ECJ artt. 10, 11 and 18 of the Damages Directive therefore give complex rules on this issue. France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom have adapted (...)

1 Sep 2017

Effect of consensual settlements on subsequent damages actions (Implementation of the EU Damages Directive into Member State law - Würzburg, May 5, 2017)

Catherine Prieto, Cristoforo Osti, Florian Wagner-von Papp, Frank Kroes, Thomas B. Paul • N° 3-2017

Hand in hand with an ever-growing amount of cartel damage litigation all across Europe, settlements have become an increasingly important tool for resolving private competition law disputes. However, while the majority of disputes concern infringements committed jointly by more than one party, (...)

1 Sep 2017

Editorial (Online markets and offline welfare effects: The Internet, competition, society and democracy - Oxford, 22 May 2017)

Ariel Ezrachi • N° 3-2017

On 22 May 2017, the University of Oxford Centre for Competition Law and Policy (“CCLP”) hosted a conference on “Online markets and offline welfare effects – The Internet, competition, society and democracy.” This collection gathers nine contributions from speakers of the event—outlining the key (...)

1 Sep 2017

Digital economy and consumer welfare (Online markets and offline welfare effects: The Internet, competition, society and democracy - Oxford, 22 May 2017)

Agustin Reyna, Alec J. Burnside, Philippe Chappatte, Sarah de Morant • N° 3-2017

While the Oxford English Dictionary defines “welfare” as “The health, happiness, and fortunes of a person or group”, it is not that simple to define the consumer welfare in the internet context. Gradual changes introduced by platforms with significant market power are able to distort the idea of (...)

1 Sep 2017

Digital economy, upstream suppliers and freedom of expression (Online markets and offline welfare effects: The Internet, competition, society and democracy - Oxford, 22 May 2017)

John Naughton • N° 3-2017

In the four decades of its existence, the internet has followed the life-cycle of earlier communications technologies in evolving from being open, generative and anarchic (or at any rate unregulated) to a network that has been largely captured by corporate interests. We are currently at the (...)

1 Sep 2017

Digital consolidation, citizen and community (Online markets and offline welfare effects: The Internet, competition, society and democracy - Oxford, 22 May 2017)

Christian D’Cunha, Jacob Turner, Liza Lovdahl Gormsen, Maurits Dolmans, Ricardo Zimbron • N° 3-2017

We are enjoying the benefits of the IT revolution over the last few decades—free online searches, free social media, free smartphone software, and constant innovation. At the same time, the online environment is more and more dominated by a handful of IT giants. Digital consolidation is (...)

1 Sep 2017

Policy and enforcement choices (Online markets and offline welfare effects: The Internet, competition, society and democracy - Oxford, 22 May 2017)

Terrell McSweeny • N° 3-2017

Algorithms are not just important in our modern society, but they also have major impacts in competition enforcement, notably in regard to the algorithmic pricing. Pricing algorithms raise three issues from a competition perspective: They may increase the effectiveness of overt collusion, (...)

1 Sep 2017

The future – politics, democracy and autonomy (Online markets and offline welfare effects : The Internet, competition, society and democracy - Oxford, 22 May 2017)

Harry First, Spencer Weber Waller • N° 3-2017

Finally, it is important to analyze the future and the effect of the growing prevalence of algorithmic-based economic activity on democracy, the media and personal autonomy. Private rights of actions play an important role in maintaining the link between antitrust and democracy. Internet (...)

1 Sep 2017

Private damages actions before and after the implementation of the Directive (Implementation of the EU Damages Directive into Member State law - Würzburg, May 5, 2017)

Cristoforo Osti, Florian Bien, Florian Wagner-von Papp, Frank Kroes, Laurence Idot • N° 3-2017

The majority of Member States have implemented the European Directive on Private Damages Actions for Breach of Competition Law, into their respective law, albeit with some delay. In particular, England, Germany, and the Netherlands, but also France and Italy have faced a certain number of (...)

1^er mai 2017

Les moteurs de recherche (L’application du droit de la concurrence au secteur numérique - Nanterre, 17 novembre 2016)

Allen Grunes, Lauren Leblond, Laurence Idot, Maurice E. Stucke, Nicolas Petit, Thomas Cheng Kin-Hon • N° 2-2017

Le cas n°1 a mis en scène les pratiques d’un moteur de recherche ; il a été traité en droit chinois, américain, japonais et en droit de l’UE. Un économiste a également apporté son éclairage. 1. Rant est un moteur de recherche particulièrement efficace, présent dans tous les pays du monde. Sur le marché (...)

1^er mai 2017

La distribution en ligne (L’application du droit de la concurrence au secteur numérique - Nanterre, 17 novembre 2016)

David Bosco, Martine Behar-Touchais, Thierry Pénard • N° 2-2017

Le cas n°2 a mis en scène les pratiques d’un fabricant de produits électroniques qui organise son réseau de distribution et s’intéresse à la commercialisation en ligne de ses produits ; il a été traité en droit de l’UE (et en droits français et allemand), en droit américain et en droit japonais. Un (...)

1^er mai 2017

Les plateformes d’intermédiation (L’application du droit de la concurrence au secteur numérique - Nanterre, 17 novembre 2016)

Anne-Sophie Choné-Grimaldi, Emmanuelle Claudel, Florian Bien, Thomas Cheng Kin-Hon • N° 2-2017

Le cas n° 3 a mis en scène les pratiques d’une plateforme d’intermédiation qui référence des professionnels ; il a été traité en droit de l’UE, allemand et français, ainsi qu’en droit américain, chinois et japonais. Un économiste a également apporté son éclairage. 1. Le Moov’ est une plateforme (...)

1^er mai 2017

L’application du droit de la concurrence au secteur numérique : Propos introductifs

Anne-Sophie Choné-Grimaldi • N° 2-2017

Depuis plusieurs années, les institutions européennes et les autorités de concurrence concentrent leur attention sur le secteur numérique (Voir La stratégie numérique pour l’Europe, lancée en mai 2010). Le colloque international qui s’est tenu à l’Université Paris Nanterre, le 17 novembre 2016, avec le (...)

1^er févr. 2017

Quelle appréhension de l’économie collaborative par le droit de la concurrence ? (Les entretiens de la concurrence III, 18 octobre 2016, Paris)

Anne Perrot, Béatrice Charlier-Bonatti, Jean-Bernard Falco • N° 1-2017

La troisième édition des Entretiens de la concurrence, consacrée aux Nouvelles opportunités économiques et juridiques devant le juge de droit commun, était destinée à souligner la spécificité et les atouts de ce dernier en droit de la concurrence. Au carrefour du droit et de l’économie, le juge de droit (...)

1^er févr. 2017

Quel traitement concurrentiel de l’accès et de l’utilisation des données ? (Les entretiens de la concurrence III, 18 octobre 2016, Paris)

Georges Decocq, Philippe Bobet • N° 1-2017

La troisième édition des Entretiens de la concurrence, consacrée aux Nouvelles opportunités économiques et juridiques devant le juge de droit commun, était destinée à souligner la spécificité et les atouts de ce dernier en droit de la concurrence. Au carrefour du droit et de l’économie, le juge de droit (...)

1^er févr. 2017

Quelle attractivité du droit de la concurrence à l’heure des réformes ? (Les entretiens de la concurrence III, 18 octobre 2016, Paris)

Alain Gauvin, Irène Luc, Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Maurice Nussenbaum, Muriel Chagny • N° 1-2017

La troisième édition des Entretiens de la concurrence, consacrée aux Nouvelles opportunités économiques et juridiques devant le juge de droit commun, était destinée à souligner la spécificité et les atouts de ce dernier en droit de la concurrence. Conduit à mettre en œuvre les règles de droit de la (...)

1^er févr. 2017

Propos conclusifs (Les entretiens de la concurrence III, 18 octobre 2016, Paris)

Chantal Arens • N° 1-2017

Le juge commercial qui est à une place privilégiée d’observateur des nouvelles opportunités économiques, telle l’économie collaborative, est de plus en plus saisi de ces problématiques au regard du droit de la concurrence. Pour que le droit français soit attractif, il doit être lisible et prévisible. (...)

1 Feb 2017

Competition and Globalization in Developing Economies (New York, October 28, 2016)

Dennis Davis, Emily Luken, Gönenç Gürkaynak, Jay Jurata, Jonathan Fried • N° 1-2017

The 2016 New York University School of Law conference, jointly organized with Concurrences Review, was held on October 28 on "Competition and Globalization in Developing Economies". The trade and competition regimes have markedly different degrees of formality at the international level and (...)

1^er sept. 2016

Innovation de rupture, droit et concurrence (Paris, 29 janvier 2016)

Bruno Lasserre, François Lévêque, Françoise Benhamou, Frédéric Jenny, Gildas de Muizon, Harry First, Mario Siragusa, Olivier Fréget, Thibaud Simphal • Nº 3-2016

L’innovation déplace aujourd’hui les positions établies d’un nombre croissant d’entreprises et d’industries. Les qualificatifs ne manquent pas pour souligner la puissance de ce phénomène : innovation drastique, innovation déstabilisante, innovation perturbatrice, innovation radicale, innovation de (...)

1 Sep 2016

Competition and trade policies: TTIP or the return of the UFOs? (New Frontiers of Antitrust, Paris, 13 June 2016)

Burcu Can, François-Charles Laprévote, Johannes Laitenberger, Simon J. Evenett • Nº 3-2016

This first roundtable of the “New frontiers of Antitrust” conference held in Paris on June 13th 2016 was dedicated to the links between competition and trade policies in light of the ongoing negotiation of the TTIP between the European Union and the United States. After an introduction of (...)

1 Sep 2016

Judicial review: A first view from the bench (New Frontiers of Antitrust, Paris, 13 June 2016)

Ian Forrester • Nº 3-2016

Achieving due process in EU competition proceedings is one especially challenging example of the general obligation of EU institutions to be fair to the citizens. Enforcing competition law inevitably implies the exercise of discretion by the public authority. Today we accept that the legitimacy (...)

1^er sept. 2016

Remarques introductives (Demain la concurrence, Paris, 13 Juin 2016)

Frédéric Jenny • Nº 3-2016

La septième édition de la conférence annuelle "Demain la concurrence" qui s’est tenue à Paris le 13 juin 2016 a été marquée par la grande diversité de ses intervenants. En ouverture de la journée, l’espoir de voir apparaître un renforcement des liens entre politique commerciale et politique de concurrence (...)

1 Sep 2016

“Free” goods and services: Is there such a thing? (New Frontiers of Antitrust, Paris, 13 June 2016)

Bruno Lasserre • Nº 3-2016

Recent years have seen the spread of free services, in particular in the digital area, whose effects on competition are not univocal. The competitive analysis of the provision of free goods and/or services, in particular when they are offered by companies holding a significant market power, is (...)

1^er sept. 2016

Is territoriality still meaningful ? (Demain la concurrence, Paris, 13 Juin 2016)

Douglas H. Ginsburg, Jacques Buhart, Joshua Hazan, Laurence Idot, Louise-Astrid Aberg • Nº 3-2016

Cette table ronde est consacrée à la question du champ d’application géographique des règles de concurrence et plus particulièrement du droit antitrust. En application des principes du droit international public, le principe de territorialité doit être respecté pour la détermination tant de la (...)

1 Sep 2016

Competition and trade policies: TTIP or the return of the UFOs? (New Frontiers of Antitrust, Paris, 13 June 2016)

Burcu Can, François-Charles Laprévote, Johannes Laitenberger, Simon J. Evenett • Nº 3-2016

This first roundtable of the “New frontiers of Antitrust” conference held in Paris on June 13th 2016 was dedicated to the links between competition and trade policies in light of the ongoing negotiation of the TTIP between the European Union and the United States. After an introduction of (...)

1 Sep 2016

Rebates: To hell with customers! (New Frontiers of Antitrust, Paris, 13 June 2016)

Andreas Mundt, Julie Vandenbussche, Trevor Soames • Nº 3-2016

Panellists of the fourth roundtable’s of the New Frontiers of Antitrust Conference came back on persistent difficulties to reconcile competition law, particularly Article 102 TFEU enforcement, with economic analysis and a "more effects-based approach". The President of the Bundeskartellamt (...)

1 Sep 2016

Rebates: To hell with customers! (New Frontiers of Antitrust, Paris, 13 June 2016)

Andreas Mundt, Julie Vandenbussche, Trevor Soames • Nº 3-2016

Panellists of the fourth roundtable’s of the New Frontiers of Antitrust Conference came back on persistent difficulties to reconcile competition law, particularly Article 102 TFEU enforcement, with economic analysis and a "more effects-based approach". The President of the Bundeskartellamt (...)

1^er févr. 2016

Rapport de synthèse (Vers un nouveau droit de la concurrence ? Lyon, 28 mai 2015)

Didier Ferrier • N° 1-2016

Le rapport de synthèse de la conférence qui s’est tenue à Lyon le 28 mai 2015 revient sur les oppositions apparues entre les différents intervenants et particulièrement sur la tendance à l’ « obscurcissement » du droit de la concurrence, alimenté par des changements qui rendraient ce droit de plus en (...)

1^er févr. 2016

De la sanction des pratiques anticoncurrentielles à la régulation de la concurrence (Vers un nouveau droit de la concurrence ? Lyon, 28 mai 2015)

Cyril Nourissat, Jean-Pierre Viennois, Josefine Hederström, Louis Vogel • N° 1-2016

Le droit de la concurrence progresse par cycles. Dans une première étape, il a eu pour objet la protection des concurrents, par le droit de la concurrence déloyale et le droit des pratiques restrictives. A cette première strate, est venu s’ajouter le droit antitrust qui ne cherchait plus à protéger (...)

total	195
total_found	195
time	0.219

Your search returned 195 results Review Conferences

Debug

Métas associées