Audio
Interview– Interview d’Irene de Angelis, par Mark Gidley : Accessible pour tous (voir ci-dessus)
– Présentations PPT : Accessible aux abonnés Concurrences+ (voir ci-dessus)
– Vidéo : Accessible aux abonnés Concurrences+ (voir ci-dessous)
– Audio : Accessible aux abonnés Concurrences+ (voir ci-dessus)
– Synthèse : Accessible aux abonnés Concurrences+ (voir ci-dessous)
– Retranscription : Accessible aux abonnés Concurrences+ (voir ci-dessus)
– Documentation liée à l’événement (Cliquez sur Voir plus ci-dessous)
– Articles Concurrences (Cliquez sur Voir plus ci-dessous)
Consultez la section "Prochaines Conferences" pour vous inscrire aux futurs webinaires.
SYNTHESE
Jon Roellke began by highlighting that competitive relationships in the financial sector can be very complex, with firms that may compete in the context of some market segments while those same firms may also be counterparties, suppliers, or joint venturers in those same or other market segments. The purpose of this panel is to explore the circumstances in which market participants both compete and collaborate and how the lines can be properly drawn between lawful competition and collaboration, on the one hand, and more problematic coordination of competitive inputs, on the other. Among collaboration agreements, some are conducted transparently, while others occur in the context of trade association activities that can involve a more limited universe of members in a particular segment. In the end, agreements between competitors typically raise antitrust and competition considerations. The challenge is to ensure that collaboration is focused on achieving procompetitive objectives and does not, either inadvertently or otherwise, create the appearance of unlawful collusion. He then presented members of the panel, inviting Irene de Angelis to share examples of circumstances in which her counsel is needed to ensure that the lines are properly drawn between lawful competition and collaboration.
