For the purpose of EU antitrust law, any entity engaged in an economic activity, that is an activity consisting in offering goods or services on a given market, regardless of its legal status and the way in which it is financed, is considered an undertaking. To qualify, no intention to earn profits is required, nor are public bodies by definition excluded. The rules governing concentrations speak of "undertakings concerned", that is the direct participants in a merger or in the acquisition of control. © European Commission
Undertaking (notion)
Institution Definition
Case Comments
Over the summer the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT“) handed down what we expect to be the first of many decisions under the Subsidy Control Act 2022 (the “SCA“): The Durham Company Limited v Durham County Council [2023] CAT 50. While the claimant was unsuccessful in this case, the (...)
In a dispute involving an Eoppep employee, the Court of Justice ruled on the concept of an undertaking carrying out an economic activity within the meaning of Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of March 11, 2002, establishing a general framework for informing (...)
The Spanish Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo) reduced by half the fine imposed by the Spanish Competition Authority (CNMC) on the Spanish association of professional basketball clubs (ACB) for imposing discriminatory conditions on non-member clubs, after finding that the period in which the (...)
On January 25, 2023, the General Court of the Union issued a judgment in case T-640/16 RENV (GEA Group AG v. European Commission). It will be recalled that in 2009, the Commission imposed fines of €173 million on ten producers of heat stabilizers for fixing prices, sharing customers, (...)
Heat stabilizers had not inspired the Commission to take precisely lukewarm decisions; the European Union General Court takes the matter further with January 25, 2023(T-640/16 RENV, GEA Group). As a reminder, in a decision dated November 11, 2009 (case COMP/38589), the European Commission (...)
On 19 January 2023, the CJEU delivered its preliminary ruling in the case Unilever Italia Mkt Operations Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, C-680/20 (“AGCM”) (“Unilever”), on two questions posed by the Consiglio di Stato (Italian Council of State). The first related to the (...)
This case summary aims to offer insight into the Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) TODEB decision, where the Board assessed whether negative clearance or individual exemption can be granted to the Data Transfer System (“DTS”) developed by the Payment and Electronic Money Institutions (...)
A research organisation is not required to reinvest any revenue it may generate into its non-economic activities. The fact that the shareholders of a research entity are profit seeking has no decisive impact on its classification as a research organisation. Introduction As governments (...)
On 04.03.2022, important amendments/additions have been introduced to the Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board (“Communiqué No. 2010/4”). With this article, it is aimed to summarize these latest amendments in the Communiqué (...)
ACCC consults on divestiture proposal for Cargotec, Konecranes merger* The ACCC is seeking views on court enforceable undertakings proposed by each of Cargotec and Konecranes in relation to their proposed merger. The proposed undertakings in Australia are based on similar remedies Cargotec (...)
The Zinatses parks judgment concerns a case of granting of structural funds and more specifically a project in the framework of a co-financing program of the ERDF (European Regional Development Fund). Project proposals are rejected when submitted by companies in difficulty, as they are not (...)
This article has been nominated for the 2023 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards. On 26 January 2022 the General Court (GC) issued its latest judgment in the Intel case, faulting fundamental aspects of the Commission’s original decision (...)
Three’s a charm for Intel: On judicial review of economic evidence to rebut a legal presumption* In 2009, the European Commission imposed what was then a record-breaking fine of EUR 1.06 billion on Intel for abuse of dominance. Intel’s initial action for annulment was dismissed by the (...)
Rethmann Group / Remondis: Bundeskartellamt examines preconditions for extended obligation to notify future takeovers (Section 39a German Competition Act, GWB)* The Bundeskartellamt has initiated a further sector inquiry in the waste management sector. The authority is going to examine (...)
On 30 December 2021, the German Bundeskartellamt (Federal Cartel Office, “FCO”) designated Alphabet Inc., parent company of Google, (“Google”) as an ‘undertaking of paramount significance for competition across markets’. The FCO is now considering whether to prohibit particular (...)
Articles
EU competition law and, more generally, EU economic regulation have gone and are still going through a phase of transformation and evolution. Two different patterns of evolution can be distinguished. A first pattern corresponds to an adaptation that seems to be driven from within the EU, and (...)
"Depending on whether you’re powerful or miserable, Court judgments will make you white or black." (J. de La Fontaine, Les Animaux malades de la peste, Fables, livre VII, 1, 1678) Every company fined by the French Competition Authority faces the question of whether or not to lodge an (...)
This section selects books on themes related to competition laws and economics. This compilation does not attempt to be exhaustive but rather a survey of themes important in the area. The survey usually covers publication over the last three months after publication of the latest issue of (...)
Patent hold-up is a complex and contemporary issue, at the confluence of competition law and intellectual property law. In recent years, this practice, which is carried out by patentees, has raised a number of difficulties in both the United States and the European Union. While patent hold-up (...)
Following various proposals in the academic literature, and in the light of the observed decrease in the number of leniency applications received by European competition authorities in the period 2015–2020, the German Monopolies Commission (Monopolkommission) proposed in 2022 to amend the (...)
What is an abuse of dominance in European competition law? Let’s take a 2022 example from a first instance court in Frankfurt, Germany (case 2-03 O 58/22). It ruled on the application of an online seller of individualised number plates for cars to get an injunction against Google. Google had (...)
Interview conducted by Romina Polley, Partner, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Cologne ********** Wolfgang, you have spent your whole career in competition law and telecom regulation. What are, in your experience, the main differences between competition and regulatory proceedings (...)
This is an updated version of Alain Alexis’ article titled: Foreign subsidy controls: The new European Commission proposal published in November 2021. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market will be applicable from 12 (...)
In February 2022, the Supreme Court of Pakistan admitted appeals on the constitutionality of the Pakistani competition regime, which is likely to decide the future of competition enforcement in the country. This article traces a brief history of the Pakistani competition regime, its (...)
Abstract On the 21st of June, at Paris was held the 13th edition of the "New Frontiers of Antitrust" conference organized by Concurrences. This conference, held each year in Paris since 2009, now ranks first among the European antitrust independent events in terms of venue, press reports and (...)
Article published in Mélanges en l’honneur de Corinne Saint-Alary-Houin, Un droit positif, un droit de progrès, LGDJ, 2020. The author’s views are purely personal. 1. The relationship between insolvency law and competition law is a particularly rich topic of reflection to which Corinne (...)
This paper provides a systematic overview of the procedural rights and obligations of third parties in investigations and proceedings conducted by the European Commission for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. Third parties are all natural or legal persons, undertakings, and (...)
In 2021, the European Court of Justice handed down an important judgment on private enforcement in Europe. It held that a claimant for damages in a cartel action can sue the subsidiary of the offender. In reaching this conclusion, the Court relied on the concept of undertaking, as developed by (...)
The last months are marked by two important judgments of the Court of Justice, one on international jurisdiction (Volvo case), the other on the liability of the subsidiary for infringements committed by its parent company (Sumal case). A series of judgments on the conflict of laws in time (...)
Table of contents: The zombie threat in the post-Covid-19 economy: Competition policy implications, Frédéric de Bure, Partner, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Paris How can merger control serve de-zombification?, Gönenç Gürkaynak, Founding Partner, ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law, (...)
Events
4th webinar of the "Antitrust in Asia: One size fits all?" Conference organised by Concurrences, in partnership with Herbert Smith Freehills. The fourth panel “In-House Counsel Roundtable: Asian Antitrust Hot Issues” with Knut Fournier (Deputy General Counsel, StubHub International), Adelaide Luke (Partner, Head of Competition, Asia, Herbert Smith Freehills), Melanie Tan (Head of Competition Law & Policy for the Asia-Pacific Region, Maersk) and Xin Roger Zhang (Senior Legal Counsel, Tencent).
Dinner organised by Concurrences in partnership with CCIA Europe, with Professor Daniel Sokol (USC Gould School of Law) and Professor Renato Nazzini (King’s College London)
4th Webinar of the 6th « Private Enforcement Conference » organised by Concurrences, in partnership with Dechert, with David Bosco (Professor, Aix-Marseille Université), Hugues Parmentier (Policy officer - ECN & private enforcement, DG COMP), Mercedes Pedraz Calvo (Judge, Audiencia Nacional), Marina Tavassi (Former President, Milan Court of Appeal | Professor of IP Law and Competition, University of Pavia) and Mélanie Thill-Tayara (Partner, Dechert).
1st Webinar of the « 5th Private Enforcement Conference » organised by Concurrences, in partnership with Linklaters, with Rafael Amaro (Professor, University of Caen Normandy), Küllike Jürimäe (Judge, CJEU), Sylvaine Poillot-Peruzzetto (Special counsellor, Cour de cassation), Ingeborg Simonsson (Judge, Patent and Market Court, Stockholm), Xavier Taton (Dispute Resolution Partner, Linklaters) and Anna Vernet (Head of Unit - ECN and private enforcement, DG COMP).
4th Webinar of the « 5th Private Enforcement Conference » organised by Concurrences, in partnership with McDermott Will & Emery and Hexagon Economics, with Aymeric Discours (Partner, McDermott Will & Emery), Laurent Eymard (Founding partner, Hexagon Economics), Julie Klein (Professor, University of Rouen) and Sir Peter Roth (President, Competition Appeal Tribunal).
Lunchtalk organized by Concurrences Review in partnership with DLA Piper.
Lunchtalk organized by Concurrences Review in partnership with DLA Piper and Suez environnement.
Antitrust Procedure Workshop organized by Concurrences in partnership with Gide Loyrette Nouel.
Workshop organized by Concurrences in partnership with Reed Smith.
Leo Flynn
Michel Debroux
Francesco Martucci
Antitrust Workshop organized by Concurrences in partnership with Clifford Chance and ECLA.
Laurent Geelhand
Christophe Roquilly
Patrick Hubert...
Books
En droit de l’Union européenne et en droit français des pratiques anticoncurrentielles, le terme « entreprise » occupe une place prépondérante. Son interprétation par les juridictions de contrôle des autorités de concurrence a répondu à des exigences d’effectivité des règles de (...)