See original article in english IP & Antitrust - #3 Data: Innovation, level playing field & access

Webinar

IP & Antitrust : Hot issues - Inaugural online edition #3 Data : Innovation, level playing field & access

3ème webinaire de la conférence « IP & Antitrust : Hot Issues » 2021 organisée par Concurrences, en partenariat avec Baker Botts et Oxera. Discours d’ouverture par Mike Walker (Chief Economic Adviser, UK Competition and Markets Authority). Panel avec Rima Alaily (Associate General Counsel - Competition Law Group, Microsoft), Carmelo Cennamo (Professeur, Copenhagen Business School), Robin Noble (Associé, Oxera) et Maureen Ohlhausen (Associée, Baker Botts).

- Interview de Rima Alaily, par Maureen Ohlhausen : Accessible aux abonnés Concurrences+ (voir ci-dessus)

- Vidéo : Accessible aux abonnés Concurrences+ (voir ci-dessous)

- Audio : Accessible aux abonnés Concurrences+ (voir ci-dessus)

- Synthèse : Accessible aux abonnés Concurrences+ (voir ci-dessus)

- Retranscription : Accessible aux abonnés Concurrences+ (voir ci-dessus)

- Articles Concurrences (Cliquez sur Voir plus ci-dessous)

Consultez la section "Prochaines Conferences" pour vous inscrire aux futurs webinaires.


SYNTHÈSE

OPENING SPEECH

Mike Walker discussed competition policy issues that revolve around data and in particular relevant theories of harm and corresponding interventions. It is often heard that data is the new oil – this is wrong, at least in the sense that there is an endless supply of data, and it is non-rivalrous. Data does share one characteristic with oil : it is very useful but comes with substantial negative externality in the form of damage to competition (as opposed to climate damage with oil). The question is therefore how we can reap the benefits of large-scale data without enduring too many competition downsides. Among the benefits are better search engines, more targeted social media and advertising and generalized economies of scope. The latter can lead to new insights and new products. These benefits are not unambiguous as economies of scale such as the ones at hand can lead to entrenched monopolies or be used to serve envelopment strategies to raise barriers to entry and discourage potential competition. This is how data use can lead to potential foreclosure. The CMA’s recent investigation into Facebook focuses on this sort of behaviour. Data can also produce discrimination whereby firms can appropriate consumer surplus and result in distributionally regressive outcomes. One has to remain objective in apprehending data and see that it brings potential harms as well as numerous benefits. Competition authorities should consider intervening, as there is a genuine debate to be had on this trade-off. How can one come up with a level playing field and lower barriers to entry for efficient competitors ?

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

Speakers

  • United Kingdom’s Competition Authority - CMA (London)
  • Microsoft (Redmond)
  • Oxera (Oxford)
  • Copenhagen Business School
  • Baker Botts (Washington)

Testimonial