The Indian Competition Authority exonerates parties from allegations of cartelization despite admission of coordination in the flashlight market (Eveready / Panasonic / Indo National / Geep / AIDCM)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Indian Competition Authority, Eveready / Panasonic / Indo National / Geep / AIDCM, Case 01/2017, 6 November 2018

CCI holds that mere information exchange by itself is not anti-competitive, in spite of leniency applications filed* The Competition Commission of India (”CCI”) by way of an order dated November 6, 2018 has exonerated Eveready Industries India Limited (“Eveready”), Panasonic Energy India Co. Ltd. (“Panasonic”), Indo National Ltd (“Indo National”) and Geep Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. (”Geep”), along with Association of Indian Dry Cell Manufacturers (“AIDCM”) (“Opposite Parties/

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Vaish Associates Advocates (New Delhi)
    India 263 contributions 40418 visits

Quotation

Man Mohan Sharma, The Indian Competition Authority exonerates parties from allegations of cartelization despite admission of coordination in the flashlight market (Eveready / Panasonic / Indo National / Geep / AIDCM), 6 November 2018, e-Competitions Utilities & Cartels, Art. N° 89445

Visites 161

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues