The US Northern District Court of California recognizes indirect purchasers’ standing in cases where component products have little independent utility (Flat Panel Antitrust Litigation)

In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145935 (N.D. Cal. 2012) Even though many states have chosen to part company with federal antitrust laws by permitting antitrust standing for so-called "indirect purchasers" under state law — despite the holding of the Supreme Court in Illlinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Douglas Richards, Christopher J. Cormier, The US Northern District Court of California recognizes indirect purchasers’ standing in cases where component products have little independent utility (Flat Panel Antitrust Litigation), 21 February 2012, e-Competitions Bulletin US Private Enforcement, Art. N° 55004

Visites 87

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues