The US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit finds in favour of the appellee on the account of its counterclaims of unjust enrichment and breach of contract in relation to a subcontracting agreement on the provision of transport and logistics for the US army in Afghanistan (Vlox / Mirzada)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Court of Appeals for the fourth Circuit (Richmond), Vlox / Mirzada, No. 12-2516, 17 December 2013

Fourth Circuit Affirms $2.8 Million Jury Verdict Obtained By Womble Carlyle For Government Subcontractor* On December 16, 2013, the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion affirming a $2.8 million jury verdict obtained by a Womble Carlyle trial team, chaired by Jason Hicks, in the Eastern

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Womble Bond Dickinson (Washington)
    United States 10 contributions 2750 visits

Quotation

Jason C. Hicks, The US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit finds in favour of the appellee on the account of its counterclaims of unjust enrichment and breach of contract in relation to a subcontracting agreement on the provision of transport and logistics for the US army in Afghanistan (Vlox / Mirzada), 17 December 2013, e-Competitions US Private Enforcement, Art. N° 61915

Visites 113

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues