A US District Court denies a motion to dismiss antitrust conspiracy claims against potato grower cooperatives in several states (Fresh and Process Potatoes)

Allegations of Conspiracy to Limit Crop Production: Ripe for Analysis Under Capper-Volstead* On December 2, 2011, the district court denied a motion to dismiss antitrust conspiracy claims against potato grower cooperatives in several states. In re Fresh and Process Potatoes Antitrust Litigation, United States District Court for the District of Idaho, Case No. 4:10-MD-2186-BLW. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant cooperatives agreed among themselves, through their cooperative structure, to restrict the output of their members by limiting potato planting acreages, paying farmers to destroy existing stocks, and refraining from bringing additional potatoes to market. The alleged purpose of the output-restricting conspiracy was to augment demand among direct purchasers of potatoes,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Sheppard Mullin (Los Angeles)

Quotation

Jr. Don T. Hibner, A US District Court denies a motion to dismiss antitrust conspiracy claims against potato grower cooperatives in several states (Fresh and Process Potatoes), 2 December 2011, e-Competitions Bulletin US Private Enforcement, Art. N° 66574

Visites 41

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues