US Hospital Mergers

Mergers

The Californian Attorney General announces a $575 million settlement with the largest hospital system in Northern California (Sutter)
McDermott Will & Emery (Chicago)
,
McDermott Will & Emery (Chicago)
,
McDermott Will & Emery (Washington)
CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL ANNOUNCES HISTORIC $575 MILLION SETTLEMENT OF ANTITRUST SUIT AGAINST SUTTER HEALTH * California Attorney General Xavier Becerra (AG Becerra) announced on Friday, December 20, 2019, the terms of a comprehensive settlement agreement reached with Sutter Health (...)

The US Administration issues an executive order releasing a pair of broad and inclusive rules aiming at advancing price transparency in the healthcare market
Morgan Lewis (Houston)
,
Morgan Lewis (Houston)
,
Morgan Lewis (Washington)
Building on an executive order issued by US President Donald Trump in June, the administration released a pair of broad and inclusive rules aimed at advancing price transparency in healthcare on November 15, 2019. Key themes emerging from the hundreds of pages of price transparency rules (...)

The US DoJ settles a lawsuit regarding a hospital system anti-steering provisions againts health plans (Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority)
Sheppard Mullin (Century City)
,
Sheppard Mullin (San Francisco)
U.S. Department of Justice Settles Anti-Steering Suit Against Hospital System; First Such Settlement After Amex SCOTUS Decision* On November 15, 2018, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice settled a two-and-a-half year long lawsuit against Atrium Health, a North Carolina (...)

The US DoJ reaches a settlement with a healthcare system related to provisions in a contract between the health system and commercial insurers (Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority)
McDermott Will & Emery (Chicago)
,
McDermott Will & Emery (Washington)
,
McDermott Will & Emery (Chicago)
THE LATEST: DOJ Announces Settlement with Carolinas Health System (Atrium Health) After Two Years of Litigation* The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced last week that it and the State of North Carolina have reached a settlement with Carolinas Healthcare System / Atrium Health relating to (...)

The US District Court of the Southern District of Ohio grants three pretrial motions and dismisses the entire case with prejudice because of the fail to plea a rule of reason case in the hospital sector (The Medical Center at Elizabeth Place / Premier health)
McDermott Will & Emery (Chicago)
District Judge Walter H. Rice of the Southern District of Ohio granted three pretrial motions brought by the Defendants on the eve of trial in The Medical Center at Elizabeth Place, LLC v. Premier Health Partners, et al., Case No. 3:12-cv-26, 2017 WL 3433131 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2017), and denied (...)

The US FTC sues to block the proposed physician acquisition group by a health system due to the possibility to create very high market shares (Sanford Health / Mid-Dakota Clinic)
McDermott Will & Emery (Washington)
With its latest lawsuit to block an acquisition of physicians, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) confirmed last week that monitoring physician consolidation is a priority. The FTC and North Dakota Attorney General sued to block the proposed acquisition by a health system (Sanford Health) of (...)

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturns a district court decision which denies a motion by the FTC to enjoin the proposed merger in a hospital merger case (FTC / Advocate Health Network)
McDermott Will & Emery (Chicago)
,
McDermott Will & Emery (Washington)
On October 31, 2016, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit handed another important victory to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the State of Illinois in a hospital merger case in Chicago, Illinois. This decision follows closely on the heels of the FTC’s victory earlier this year (...)

The US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division denies preliminary injunction on the basis that geographic market analysis was erroneous in a hospital merger case (Advocate Health / NorthShore)
Constantine Cannon (Washington)
GEOGRAPHIC MARKET DEFINITION TRIPS UP FTC AS FEDERAL COURT REJECTS CHALLENGE TO ADVOCATE-NOTHSHORE HOSPITAL MERGER* The loss of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in a hospital merger case in the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois last week highlights just how tricky (...)

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rules on bundling in the pharmaceutical sector (Eisai / Sanofi)
Constantine Cannon (New York)
Third Circuit Shows No Love For Lovenox® Bundling Theory*Citing the well-known maxim that the antitrust laws are concerned with “the protection of competition, not competitors,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Wednesday affirmed summary judgment for Defendant Sanofi Aventis on (...)

The US DoJ sues four hospitals for an anticompetitive agreement in South-Central Michigan (Hillsdale / Branch / ProMedica / Allegiance)
Crowell & Moring (New York)
Antitrust Enforcers Sue Four Hospitals For Carving Up South-Central Michigan* The Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Michigan Attorney General’s Office are suing four Michigan hospital systems for allegedly engaging in antitrust violations by agreeing to refrain from (...)

The US Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit annuls a district court’s order which certified a class of direct purchasers in a price-fixing suit in the blood reagents market (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics)
McDermott Will & Emery (Paris)
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court’s order certifying a class of direct purchasers of blood reagents in a price-fixing suit against Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics Inc. In re Blood Reagents, case number 12-4067. Plaintiffs allege that (...)

Procedures

The US Court of Appeals for the sixth circuit establishes test for determining whether the conduct of joint ventures should be analysed under the rule of reason test (The Medical Center at Elizabeth Place / Atrium Health System)
McDermott Will & Emery (Chicago)
,
McDermott Will & Emery (Washington)
,
McDermott Will & Emery (Chicago)
A recent decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is important for competitors involved in joint ventures because it states what mode of antitrust analysis—the per se rule or the rule of reason—applies to the conduct of joint ventures when it is challenged as anticompetitive. The (...)

The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit considers that activity in connection with a joint venture that is plausibly procompetitive is not subject to per se analysis or condemnation (The Medical Center at Elizabeth Place / Atrium Health System)
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (San Francisco)
Plausible Pro-competitive Justifications Remove Joint Venture Restraints from the Per Se Rule* In The Medical Center at Elizabeth Place, LLC v. Atrium Health System, Case No. 17-3863 (6th Cir. Apr. 25, 2019), the Sixth Circuit held that activity in connection with a joint venture that is (...)

The US Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit overturns judgment of the District Court which rejected a class action on the basis of lack of evidence on potential substitutes in geographic markets (Sutter Health)
Crowell & Moring (New York)
Health Plan Members Convince Ninth Circuit to Revive Antitrust Class Action Against Dominant Northern California Healthcare Provider Sutter Health*An antitrust class action challenging the dominance of healthcare provider Sutter Health in Northern California received a new lease on life Friday (...)

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues