The EU Court of Justice rules that seemingly separate interventions may constitute a single measure if they are inseparable by way of timing, purpose and the condition of the beneficiary undertaking (Bouygues)

Where is the Money? The Link between Advantage and Transfer of State Resources* On 19 March 2013, the Court of Justice delivered an important judgment in case C-399/10 P, Bouygues v European Commission concerning aid that was granted by France to France Telecom. The case was an appeal to an earlier ruling of the General Court in case T 425/04 France and Others v Commission which annulled Article 1 of Commission Decision 2006/621 [OJ 2006 L 257, p. 11] which had declared the aid granted to France Telecom as incompatible with the internal market. Background The European Commission found that France had granted aid to France telecom (FT). The aid was considered to be incompatible with the internal market and had to be recovered. Very unusually, the aid consisted of favourable public

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Phedon Nicolaides, The EU Court of Justice rules that seemingly separate interventions may constitute a single measure if they are inseparable by way of timing, purpose and the condition of the beneficiary undertaking (Bouygues), 19 March 2013, e-Competitions State intervention, Art. N° 59067

Visites 141

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues