The EU General Court holds that compensation for structural disadvantages encumbering undertakings is still State aid except if it satisfies the Altmark criteria (France)

* Article published on State Aid Hub (click here), republished in e-Competitions with the courtesy of the author(s). The original title of this article appears below the e-Competitions title. Authors are welcome to write an alternative article on this case/text, provided they have no relationships with a party or related third party. Article will need e-Competitions Board approval before publication.

Relief from Pension Contributions* Compensation for structural disadvantages encumbering undertakings is still State aid. Compensation for structural disadvantages encumbering SGEI providers is not State aid only if it satisfies the Altmark criteria. Judgment of 26 February 2015, T-135/12, France v Commission. The judgment concerns a measure that partly relieved France Telecom from financing extra pension benefits for those of its staff who had civil servant status [1]. When France Telecoms was privatised in the early 1990s, its staff retained the privileges they enjoyed as state

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Phedon Nicolaides, The EU General Court holds that compensation for structural disadvantages encumbering undertakings is still State aid except if it satisfies the Altmark criteria (France), 26 February 2015, e-Competitions SGEI and competition law, Art. N° 72565

Visites 205

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues