The US District Court for the District of Massachusetts rejects a request for a new trial to challenge a pay-for-delay agreement (Nexium)

Judgment for Drug Companies Unlikely the End of the Road in Nexium Case* The federal district court in Boston has rejected a request from purchasers of AstraZeneca LP’s heartburn medication Nexium for a new trial to challenge a “reverse payment” or “pay-for-delay” agreement between AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals to block the entry of a generic version of the drug. Judge Young’s lengthy opinion provides an interesting look at the trial and the proceedings that led up to it. In addition, the decision offers a glimpse of the issues that might be raised in a likely appeal. In December 2014, the jury had found that a patent settlement agreement between AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy was unreasonably anticompetitive under a rule of reason standard. However, the jury saw no causal link between

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Wolters Kluwer (Riverwoods)

Quotation

Jeffrey May, The US District Court for the District of Massachusetts rejects a request for a new trial to challenge a pay-for-delay agreement (Nexium), 30 July 2015, e-Competitions Pay-for-delay agreements, Art. N° 75199

Visites 615

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues