The US Supreme Court upholds a decision stating that the restrictions imposed by the sports association on education-related compensation for student-athletes violate the antitrust laws (NCAA / Alston)

More to Supreme Court's NCAA decision than just sports* Introduction There has been a plethora of articles about the Supreme Court's 21 June 2021 decision upholding a decision that the restrictions imposed by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) on education-related compensation to student athletes violate the antitrust laws. Many have opined that the decision signals the death knell of the NCAA; others portend a wave of lawsuits by athletes against the NCAA and US universities. But for those not focused on such matters, the decision is important for the antitrust treatment of joint ventures and to general business decision-making. In this regard, the NCAA is a joint venture: it comprises member universities that have joined together to create the rules and

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Baker & Miller (Washington)

Quotation

Todd Miller, The US Supreme Court upholds a decision stating that the restrictions imposed by the sports association on education-related compensation for student-athletes violate the antitrust laws (NCAA / Alston), 21 June 2021, e-Competitions Mergers & Joint ventures, Art. N° 101352

Visites 217

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues