The US District Court for the District of Columbia seeks behavioral remedies before approving a joint-venture to prevent exclusionary conduct in the online video distribution and video programming markets (Comcast / NBC Universal)

The Federal Communication Commission’s recent decision to allow the transaction between Comcast and General Electric’s NBC Universal (NBCU) affiliate to proceed subject to conditions [1] helped to fill a gap in the contemporary treatment of vertical mergers. The existence of this gap was dramatized for me when, in drafting an antitrust casebook section on vertical mergers, I was unable to find a judicial opinion that assimilated the economic learning and antitrust commentary on exclusionary conduct from the last quarter-century. [2] The FCC is not a court but is an independent agency, like the Federal Trade Commission, that issues adjudicative decisions concerning acquisitions within its jurisdiction based on an administrative record. [3] The FCC evaluates transactions under a public

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • American University’s Washington College of Law (Washington)

Quotation

Jonathan B. Baker, The US District Court for the District of Columbia seeks behavioral remedies before approving a joint-venture to prevent exclusionary conduct in the online video distribution and video programming markets (Comcast / NBC Universal), 1 September 2011, e-Competitions Mergers & Acquisitions in online platforms, Art. N° 53271

Visites 308

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues