The US District Court for the Northern District of California finds evidence that the merging parties expected the transaction to have anticompetitive effects (Bazaarvoice / PowerReviews)

Ullman, Howard M.

Previous article The US District Court for the Northern District of California rules against a non-reported acquisition in the sector of product ratings and review platforms (Bazaarvoice / PowerReviews) Next article The EU General Court rejects a rival’s claim and gives the green signal for an acquisition in the communications services market (Microsoft / Skype)

8 Jan 2014

The US District Court for the Northern District of California finds evidence that the merging parties expected the transaction to have anticompetitive effects (Bazaarvoice / PowerReviews)

KEYWORDS

Reference

US District Court for the Northern District of California, Bazaarvoice / PowerReviews, Case No. 13-cv-00133-WHO, 8 January 2014

Another Example of Why You Should Follow the “New York Times” Rule — the Bazaarvoice Decision* Have you heard of the New York Times rule? The rule is: don’t write something down in a business communication unless you’re comfortable with its text appearing in the New York Times. If everyone followed this rule, lawyers would be substantially less busy than they are.

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

PDF Version

Author

Howard M. Ullman
Dechert (San Francisco)

United States 25 contributions 8719 visits

Quotation

Howard M. Ullman, The US District Court for the Northern District of California finds evidence that the merging parties expected the transaction to have anticompetitive effects (Bazaarvoice / PowerReviews), 8 January 2014, e-Competitions Mergers & Acquisitions in online platforms, Art. N° 62355

Visites 240