The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirms the District Court judgment for titanium dioxide purchaser on the grounds that the plaintiff lacked sufficient evidence to allege a conspiracy to fix prices (Valspar / DuPont)

What Happened: On October 2, 2017, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit unsealed its opinion in Valspar Corp. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., No. 16-1345 2017 WL 4364317 (3d Cir. Sept. 14, 2017) in which the court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant on the grounds that plaintiff lacked sufficient evidence to allege a conspiracy to fix prices. Valspar alleged that titanium dioxide suppliers engaged in price-fixing, citing evidence

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • McDermott Will & Emery (Washington)

Quotation

Ashley McMahon, The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirms the District Court judgment for titanium dioxide purchaser on the grounds that the plaintiff lacked sufficient evidence to allege a conspiracy to fix prices (Valspar / DuPont), 14 September 2017, e-Competitions Judicial review, Art. N° 93067

Visites 89

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues