The duties of merging firms to notify their concentrations and refrain from implementing their transactions until they receive the necessary clearance have been subject to increased survey by competition authorities around the world in the past year. At the EU level, the Commission’s recent practice shows an intention to use more of the instruments at its disposal to sanction companies and deter them from jumping the gun, for example by, when appropriate, making use of the maximum permitted fine or fining the target company in addition to the acquirer. At the national level, the same dynamics are at play, with record fines, first decisions sanctioning the breach of both the notification and the standstill obligation, and a desire to educate actors on how to avoid gun-jumping when planning a merger. Outside the EU, competition authorities around the world signal their intention to intensify their gun jumping enforcement, either by increasing their fining capacity, adopting gun jumping decisions for the first time or imposing record-breaking fines.
Read more