Introduction: In recent weeks, highly praised opinion ("Opinion”) of the Advocate General Rantos, which was originally published in French, is released in English. [1] In this article, we summarized the opinion of the Advocate General in four short sections and, supplemented each section with the decisional practice of the Turkish Competition Authority (the “TCA”) as a comparison benchmark. A. Background of the Case: By way of background, the conduct at issue in the proceedings, investigated by the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (‘the AGCM’), took place against the backdrop of the opening up of the market for the supply of electricity in Italy and took the form of an alleged complex abusive strategy implemented by the three companies of the ENEL SpA Group (the incumbent
Share on
|
|
The EU Court of Justice AG Rantos suggests to the Court criteria to qualify abusive exploitation for a dominant position involving exclusionary practices (Servizio Elettrico Nazionale)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.
