The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit overturns a district court decision certifying a class of direct purchaser plaintiffs without undertaking a rigorous analysis to resolve factual disputes, assess competing evidence, or weigh conflicting expert testimony (Lamictal)

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently concluded in In re Lamictal Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation that a district court’s reliance on average prices to determine class-wide impact was insufficient. Instead, courts must conduct a rigorous analysis of the facts, evidence and expert testimony at the class certification stage of litigation. IN DEPTH On April 22, 2020, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit overturned a district court decision certifying a class of direct purchaser plaintiffs without undertaking a rigorous analysis to resolve factual disputes, assess competing evidence or weigh conflicting expert testimony. See In re Lamictal Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig., No. 19-1655 (3d Cir. April 22, 2020). The Third Circuit concluded that the district

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • McDermott Will & Emery (New York)
  • Crowell & Moring (Washington)
  • McDermott Will & Emery (Chicago)

Quotation

Nicole L. Castle, Stefan M. Meisner, Stephen Wu, The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit overturns a district court decision certifying a class of direct purchaser plaintiffs without undertaking a rigorous analysis to resolve factual disputes, assess competing evidence, or weigh conflicting expert testimony (Lamictal), 22 April 2020, e-Competitions Burden of proof, Art. N° 95089

Visites 187

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues