The Indian Competition Authority orders the closure of an investigation into alleged cartelization in the airlines industry because the observed price parallelism was not proven to have occurred through cartelization (Jet Airways / Indigo / Spice Jet / Go Air / Air India)

KEY POINTS Mere price parallelism does not amount to cartelization, if: (i) the market prices have fluctuated, at times with significant margins, (ii) new players are easily able to establish themselves; (iii) all players offer more or less similar kinds of services, and (iv) the prices depend on a variety of factors. BRIEF FACTS The case was initiated suo motu after CCI received a request from the Lok Sabha secretariat to examine any evidence of cartelization within the airline sector. CCI sought information from Jet Airways (including JetLite), Indigo Airlines, SpiceJet, GoAir, and Air India for four major routes viz.

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

L. Badri Narayanan, Charanya Lakshmikumaran, Neelambera Sandeepan, Aditya Bhattacharya, Rishabh Chopra, The Indian Competition Authority orders the closure of an investigation into alleged cartelization in the airlines industry because the observed price parallelism was not proven to have occurred through cartelization (Jet Airways / Indigo / Spice Jet / Go Air / Air India), 22 February 2021, e-Competitions Burden of proof, Art. N° 102933

Visites 48

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues