Previous article

Burden of proof and competition law: An overview of the case-law in major jurisdictions

Rule of reason, passing-on defence, per se infringements, extraterritoriality, illegally obtained evidence, alternative explanations, indirect evidence are only some of the notions interpreted and applied by competition law courts on both sides of the Atlantic. Do the judges analyse and apply them in a similar fashion? Given that two courts of the same jurisdiction may hold differing views on the same issue, one might say that the question is not worth asking. But still. The question is worth asking when various jurisdictions are compared, each one taken as a whole, with a focus on the substance rather than on differing formulas. This special issue brings together a critical mass of articles enabling the practitioner to gain an overview of complex matters in a concise but also precise

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • General Court of the European Union (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Georgios Gryllos, Burden of proof and competition law: An overview of the case-law in major jurisdictions, 19 July 2018, e-Competitions Bulletin Burden of proof, Art. N° 87398

Visites 1126

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues