EU Judicial Review: Major Antitrust Implications of Recent State Aid Cases* We competition lawyers often wrongly approach our discipline in isolation from the wider context in which it is applied. This is also true when it comes to judicial review. We tend to forget that antitrust is only a fraction of what the EU Courts and EU judges do, and that what they do in other areas might also have major implications in ours. A perfect illustration of what I’m saying lies in two State aid judgments: C‑300/16 P, Frucona Kosice, and the very recent T-865/16, Fútbol Club Barcelona v Commission. Both cases relate to how the Court approaches judicial review of complex economic assessments when the burden of proof is on the Commission. This, as you know, is an issue common to antitrust, mergers and
Share on
|
|
The EU Court of Justice and the General Court rule in two separate judgments on State aid showing how the Courts’ approach a judicial review of complex economic assessments when the burden of proof is on the Commission (Frucona Kosice) (Fútbol Club Barcelona)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.
