The Canadian Supreme Court expands the scope of potential liability in price-fixing class actions (Godfrey)

The Supreme Court of Canada has released its long-awaited decision in two companion appeals that have significant implications for class actions alleging conduct that contravenes the criminal provisions found in Part VI of the Competition Act (Act). In its decision in Pioneer Corporation v Godfrey and Toshiba Corporation v Godfrey (Godfrey), the Supreme Court confirmed, among other things, that “umbrella purchasers” can assert claims in connection with alleged price-fixing conspiracies. Umbrella purchasers are purchasers who acquire products directly or indirectly from non-conspirators, but who nevertheless allege they were overcharged because price-fixing by the conspirators caused firms that did not participate in the conspiracy to raise their prices. The 8–1 ruling written by

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg (Toronto)
  • Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg (Toronto)
  • Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg (Toronto)
  • Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg (Toronto)

Quotation

Derek Ricci, Chantelle Cseh, Maura O'Sullivan, Sandra A. Forbes, The Canadian Supreme Court expands the scope of potential liability in price-fixing class actions (Godfrey), 20 September 2019, e-Competitions Bulletin September 2019, Art. N° 92035

Visites 73

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues