The Canadian Supreme Court clarifies several procedural questions relating to class actions, with potential significance to class actions in the UK and EU (Pioneer / Godfrey)

This article has been nominated for the 2020 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards.

On September 20, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) issued a landmark antitrust class action decision in Pioneer Corp. v Godfrey which clarified several procedural questions relating to class actions. Notably, the Godfrey decision addressed the following three important points: Loss as a common issue. For a class action to succeed, there must be a showing that the class members were injured, but the level or even fact of injury can vary. Godfrey considered the burden to make this showing. Application of the limitation period. The statute of limitations puts a time limit on when claims can be brought, but there is often a dispute about when the clock started ticking. Umbrella purchaser claims. Umbrella damages are claims for purchases from non-cartelists whose prices may have been

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Allen & Overy (Washington)
  • Allen & Overy (Brussels)
  • Allen & Overy (Washington)

Quotation

Jana Steenholdt, Francesca Miotto, John Roberti, The Canadian Supreme Court clarifies several procedural questions relating to class actions, with potential significance to class actions in the UK and EU (Pioneer / Godfrey), 20 September 2019, e-Competitions September 2019, Art. N° 96883

Visites 23

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues