The Advocate General Bobek publishes his opinion on the concept of restriction of competition by "object" or by "effect" (Budapest Bank)

AG BOBEK'S OPINION IN BUDAPEST BANK: ON OBJECT VS. EFFECT, FISH AND LILIES* On September 5, 2019, Advocate General Bobek published his opinion in the Budapest Bank case (C-228/18). The opinion provides very clear and practical guidance on the concept of restriction of competition by object – a subject that has long been a bone of contention among competition practitioners, enforcers and courts. The opinion is also noteworthy as it features an unorthodox, though pedagogic, metaphor on restrictions of competition involving fish and lilies. In sum, it is worth a commentary. Quick refresher on object vs. effect The concept of restriction of competition by object is rooted in Article 101 TFEU, which prohibits agreements “[…] which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Yves Botteman, Camille Keres, The Advocate General Bobek publishes his opinion on the concept of restriction of competition by "object" or by "effect" (Budapest Bank), 5 September 2019, e-Competitions Bulletin September 2019, Art. N° 92036

Visites 397

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues