The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirms the district court’s denial of class certification and the dismissal of complaint with prejudice (Sommers / Apple)

If Your Allegations Don’t Establish a Price Effect, You May Lack Antitrust Standing* In Somers v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 11-16896 (9th Cir. Sept. 3, 2013), the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a putative class action against Apple, Inc., alleging antitrust violations in connection with Apple’s iPod and its Tunes Music Store. The case illustrates the dangers of failing to adequately allege a price effect caused by a defendant’s purportedly anticompetitive conduct. On behalf of a putative class, Somers

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (San Francisco)

Quotation

Howard M. Ullman, The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirms the district court’s denial of class certification and the dismissal of complaint with prejudice (Sommers / Apple), 3 September 2013, e-Competitions Bulletin September 2013, Art. N° 56411

Visites 234

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues