The EU Court of Justice holds that in-house lawyers are not protected by legal professional privilege in antitrust investigations (Akzo)

On September 14, 2010, the Court of Justice (the Court) issued its judgment in Akzo v. Commission (Case C-550/07 P, hereinafter the Judgment) dismissing an appeal brought by Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd. (Akzo) against a judgment of the Court of First instance (now the General Court) of September 17, 2007. The Court upheld and clarified its former AM&S ruling (see Case 155/79) holding that in-house lawyers are not protected by legal professional privilege in antitrust investigations conducted by the European Commission even if the lawyer in question is admitted to, and subject to the ethical

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Brussels)
  • Dentons (Brussels)

Quotation

Frederic Depoortere, James S. Venit, The EU Court of Justice holds that in-house lawyers are not protected by legal professional privilege in antitrust investigations (Akzo), 14 September 2010, e-Competitions September 2010, Art. N° 45408

Visites 350

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues