The EU General Court issues a new decision concerned with the extent of the duty to provide reasons to disappointed tenderers (Sviluppo Globale GEIE)

Again on procurement debriefing and its excesses: Extent of the duty to give (very detailed) reasons to bidders and right to a fair trial (T-183/10)* In its Judgment of 10 October 2012 in case T‑183/10 Sviluppo Globale GEIE v Commission, the General Court has issued a new decision concerned with the extent of the duty to provide reasons to disappointed tenderers on the basis of Article 100(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ 2002 L 248, p. 1) (‘the Financial Regulation’) [1]. Interestingly, the GC expressly highlights the link between the duty to give reasons and the right to effective judicial protection under Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Albert Sánchez Graells, The EU General Court issues a new decision concerned with the extent of the duty to provide reasons to disappointed tenderers (Sviluppo Globale GEIE), 10 October 2012, e-Competitions Bulletin October 2012, Art. N° 64144

Visites 144

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues