The enactment of a Maryland state antitrust law prohibiting minimum resale price maintenance (RPM) agreements and U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee hearings on similar pending federal legislation are reminders that minimum RPM programs must be approached with caution. Notwithstanding the Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v.
The US State of Maryland enacts a state antitrust law making minimum resale price maintenance agreements per se illegal
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.