The District Court of Northern District of California reluctantly allows tying claims to go forward (Oracle)

District Court Reluctantly Allows Tying Claims Against Oracle to Go Forward* Last Friday, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal of the Northern District of California denied a motion by Oracle to dismiss three counterclaims based on a tying theory in Oracle America, Inc. v. Terix Computer Co. In doing so, the court followed (if begrudgingly) the Supreme Court’s decision in its seminal tying case, Eastman Kodak

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler (New York)
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler (New York)

Quotation

Thomas W. Pippert, John P. Figura, The District Court of Northern District of California reluctantly allows tying claims to go forward (Oracle), 7 November 2014, e-Competitions Bulletin November 2014, Art. N° 70350

Visites 92

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues