The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania adopts a final judgment on a failure to respond to the request for information during the investigation (UAB, Plungės duona)

On 27 November 2012 the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania issued a final judgment in the case in which the undertaking UAB “Plungės duona” was accused of having not responded in due course to the Competition Council’s request for information during the investigation which was carried out by the Competition Council on the allegedly anti-competitive agreements in which UAB “Plungės duona” was suspected to have taken part. The Competition Council – in its decision [1] - held that UAB “Plungės duona” infringed Article 26(6) [now Article 25(6)] and Article 41(3) [now Article 36(3)] of the Law on Competition. The infringement was considered as a severe and dangerous infringement of a procedural nature of the Law on Competition and was said to have amounted to the obstruction of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (Munich)

Quotation

Gintarė Surblytė, The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania adopts a final judgment on a failure to respond to the request for information during the investigation (UAB, Plungės duona), 27 November 2012, e-Competitions November 2012, Art. N° 70973

Visites 214

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues