I. Introduction The dissemination of historical information can still imply certain risks for the public or private interest and require confidential treatment . The present case refers to an action for annulment comprising a claim of confidential treatment of the information contained by Commission Decision. In 2006 the Commission established by its Decision that an infringement of Article 101 TFEU had been committed by the applicants, Akzo Nobel, Akzo Nobel Chemicals Holding and Eka Chemicals, and by 14 other undertakings between 1994 and 2000 on the market for hydrogen peroxide and perborate. The applicants in the present case were first and respectively second whistle-blower in the context of Leniency Notice. The Commission published, in September 2007 after taking into
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.