The UK Competition Authority clears merger in the multilateral trading facilities sector concluding that sponsored entry’s strong threat would disincentivize the merged firm from raising prices (BATS / Chi-X)

This article is the winner of the 2013 Antitrust Writing Awards, Business Category, Economics section.

Sponsored Entry* Some mergers materially reduce the choice of suppliers available to customers. When this happens, how much weight should competition authorities give to the potential for customers to sponsor new entry? Two recent cases investigated by the UK Competition Commission (CC) give an insight into the circumstances in which sponsored entry arguments are likely to be successful. In one case, it was concluded that the threat of customers sponsoring a new entrant was so potent that the merged firm would have no incentive to raise prices. In the other, customers were found to have shifted significant volumes to alternative suppliers following a completed transaction which raised substantial competition concerns. The CC cleared both deals without conditions [1]. Defining

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • CRA International (London)

Quotation

Alan Overd, The UK Competition Authority clears merger in the multilateral trading facilities sector concluding that sponsored entry’s strong threat would disincentivize the merged firm from raising prices (BATS / Chi-X), 24 November 2011, e-Competitions November 2011, Art. N° 53940

Visites 82

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues