The US Court of Appeal for the 11th Circuit issues a decision which holds that a company cannot conspire with majority-owned and controlled subsidiary (OJ Commerce / Kidkraft / Ikea)

Peifer, Lee

Previous article The Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules that two Dutch collective rights organisations abused their joint dominant position by applying unequal conditions when licensing music to businesses (Buma / Stemra) Next article The Polish Competition Authority imposes a penalty on a grain trading company for unfair use of contractual advantage (Cefetra Polska)

24 May 2022

The US Court of Appeal for the 11th Circuit issues a decision which holds that a company cannot conspire with majority-owned and controlled subsidiary (OJ Commerce / Kidkraft / Ikea)

KEYWORDS

Reference

US Court of Appeal 11th Circuit, OJ Commerce / Kidkraft / Ikea, Court decision, Docket. 0:19-cv-60341-MGC, 24 May 2022

Antitrust Claim Rejected: Parent Company Cannot “Conspire” with Majority-Owned and Controlled Subsidiary* A private-equity firm and its majority-owned subsidiary preserved a defense summary judgment on antitrust conspiracy and monopolization claims in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

PDF Version

Author

Lee Peifer
Eversheds Sutherland (Atlanta)

United States 1 contribution 14 visits

Quotation

Lee Peifer, The US Court of Appeal for the 11th Circuit issues a decision which holds that a company cannot conspire with majority-owned and controlled subsidiary (OJ Commerce / Kidkraft / Ikea), 24 May 2022, e-Competitions May 2022, Art. N° 109148

Visites 14