The Australian Federal Court rules against submissions on agreed penalties (Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate / Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union)

On 1 May 2015 the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia ruled that it was not permissible for parties to make joint submissions as to the appropriate ‘pecuniary penalty’ to be imposed: Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCAFC 59 (1 May 2015) (CFMEU). This decision has significant implications for the existing common practice of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and respondents to make agreed joint submissions as to appropriate pecuniary penalties in competition law cases. Background In Australia, only the Court has power to make orders and decide on penalties relating to contraventions of competition laws. It has, however, been common for the ACCC and respondents to make agreed

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Deakin University (Geelong)

Quotation

Julie Clarke, The Australian Federal Court rules against submissions on agreed penalties (Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate / Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union), 1 May 2015, e-Competitions May 2015, Art. N° 73596

Visites 206

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues