The US District Court for the Northern District of California explains that the predominance element of a class action “does not require a plaintiff to prove that each element of her claim is susceptible to class wide proof” (Diamond Foods Securities Litigation)

Shareholders of a nut processing, marketing and distributing company brought a class action under the federal

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Douglas Richards, Christopher J. Cormier, The US District Court for the Northern District of California explains that the predominance element of a class action “does not require a plaintiff to prove that each element of her claim is susceptible to class wide proof” (Diamond Foods Securities Litigation), 6 May 2013, e-Competitions May 2013, Art. N° 61450

Visites 78

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues