The EU Court of Justice Advocate General Mazak supports the General Court’s refusal of appeal in case involving an abuse of dominant position (AstraZeneca)

On 15 May 2012, the Advocate General of the EU Court of Justice issued his opinion on the appeal of the General Court’s judgment in AstraZeneca v. Commission. [1] The Advocate General largely agreed with the reasoning and holdings of the General Court, and recommended that the Court of Justice reject all appeals, including AstraZeneca’s appeal challenging the General Court’s analysis of the definition of the relevant markets and the findings that AstraZeneca’s regulatory activities related to its product Losec constituted an abuse of a dominant position in violation of Article 102 TFEU. This opinion will come as a disappointment to many life science companies, which are struggling to come to terms with the new concept of an abuse of regulatory procedures. As demonstrated by the January

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Covington & Burling (Brussels)

Quotation

Peter Bogaert, The EU Court of Justice Advocate General Mazak supports the General Court’s refusal of appeal in case involving an abuse of dominant position (AstraZeneca), 15 May 2012, e-Competitions May 2012, Art. N° 95817

Visites 17

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues