The US Court of Appeals reiterates that it is possible to monopolize a technology market rather than a physical product market (Samsung / Apple)

Ullman, Howard M.

Previous article The German Federal Court of Justice clarifies that examination of a company’s pricing elements can be the sole legal test in determining excessive pricing (Water supplier) Next article The Macedonian High Administrative Court upholds the NCA’s infringement decision finding an abuse of dominant position on the funeral services market (JPKD Komunalec Strumica)

14 May 2012

The US Court of Appeals reiterates that it is possible to monopolize a technology market rather than a physical product market (Samsung / Apple)

KEYWORDS

Reference

US Court of Appeals, Apple / Samsung, Case No. 11-CV-01846, 14 May 2012

Northern District of California Reiterates That You Can Monopolize a Technology Market* In Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case No. 11-CV-01846 (N.D. Cal. May 14, 2012) (Koh, J.), a patent case, the court refused to dismiss Apple’s counterclaims, including a Sherman Act § 2 counterclaim, against Samsung arising out of Samsung’s alleged manipulation of the mobile phone

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

PDF Version

Author

Howard M. Ullman
Dechert (San Francisco)

United States 25 contributions 8805 visits

Quotation

Howard M. Ullman, The US Court of Appeals reiterates that it is possible to monopolize a technology market rather than a physical product market (Samsung / Apple), 14 May 2012, e-Competitions May 2012, Art. N° 47319

Visites 501