The EU Court of Justice clarifies the criteria for determining the existence of a concerted practice (John Deere)
Case C-7/95 P
John Deere Ltd v Commission of the European Communities*
1. It follows from Article 168a of the Treaty, Article 51 of the Statute of the Court of Justice and Article 112(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure that an appeal must indicate precisely the contested elements of the judgment which the appellant seeks to have set aside, and also the legal arguments specifically advanced in support of the appeal.
That requirement is not satisfied by an appeal which, without even containing any arguments specifically contesting the judgment appealed against, merely repeats or reproduces word for word the pleas in law and arguments previously submitted to the Court of First Instance, including those based on facts expressly rejected by that court. Such an appeal amounts in reality to no
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in