The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California sets student-athletes’ antitrust case for trial (National Collegiate Athletic Association)

On March 28, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rejected an attempt by the NCAA and 11 conferences to dismiss claims brought by current and former student-athletes playing Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) football and men’s and women’s Division I basketball. In re: National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletic Grant-in-Aid Cap Antitrust Litig., 2018 WL 1524005, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2018). Plaintiffs alleged that defendants violated antitrust law by “conspiring to impose an artificial ceiling on the scholarships and benefits that student-athletes may receive as payment for their athletic services.” Id. O’Bannon background The court began its opinion by describing the earlier litigation brought by former basketball player Ed O’Bannon by

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Rutgers University (New Jersey)

Quotation

Michael A. Carrier, The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California sets student-athletes’ antitrust case for trial (National Collegiate Athletic Association), 28 March 2018, e-Competitions March 2018, Art. N° 87066

Visites 291

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues