The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit applies cost screen to tying by differential pricing (Collins Inkjet / Eastman Kodak)

Sixth Circuit Applies Cost Screen to Tying by Differential Pricing* In Collins Inkjet Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., No. 14-3306 (6th Cir. March 16, 2015), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that differential pricing – charging more for one product when the customer does not also purchase a second product – can constitute an unlawful tying arrangement only when the price differential in effect discounts the second product below the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (San Francisco)

Quotation

Howard M. Ullman, The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit applies cost screen to tying by differential pricing (Collins Inkjet / Eastman Kodak), 16 March 2015, e-Competitions March 2015, Art. N° 72685

Visites 235

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues