Background & facts of the case Under the facts of the case a limited liability company applied for an EU-funded subsidy supporting investment in a photovoltaic installation, indicating in the application that it had a status of a microenterprise. The funding authority challenged that assessment under the Commission’s recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), as it found that the beneficiary and another undertaking were controlled by a group of individuals with mutual family relationships, as well as were bound by various product links, discussed below in more detail. In reply the applicant refused to adjust its statement on the SME status. It admitted that it was controlled by a family which also held the other
Share on
|
|
The Polish regional administrative court in Poznan issues judgment on the extensive interpretation of small and medium-sized enterprises
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.
