The US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania holds that reverse payments cases will proceed to discovery in a patent litigation in the pharmaceutical sector (Cephalon)

In the latest development in the Federal Trade Commission’s efforts to challenge Hatch-Waxman patent litigation settlements, earlier this week a federal district court in Pennsylvania denied in part defendants’ motions to dismiss antitrust complaints challenging a series of such settlements. The court rejected the argument of the FTC and other plaintiffs that a settlement that includes a “reverse payment” from the patent holder to the generic entrant is a per se antitrust violation and adopted instead the “scope of the patent” standard followed by most other courts. Under that standard, the court concluded that plaintiffs had alleged sufficient facts that, if true, could establish that

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Covington & Burling (Washington)
  • Covington & Burling (Washington)
  • Covington & Burling (Washington)
  • Covington & Burling (Washington)
  • Covington & Burling (Washington)
  • Covington & Burling (Washington)

Quotation

Thomas O. Barnett, James R. Dean, Deborah A. Garza, John D. Graubert, Timothy C. Hester, James J. O'Connell, The US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania holds that reverse payments cases will proceed to discovery in a patent litigation in the pharmaceutical sector (Cephalon), 29 March 2010, e-Competitions March 2010, Art. N° 95877

Visites 31

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues