The EU General Court provides further guidance on the standard of judicial review of Commission decisions not to raise objections at the end of a preliminary examination phase (Achema / Lifosa) (Verband Deutscher Alten)

On 14 April 2021, the General Court delivered two judgments (Achema and Lifosa, Case T-300/19, and Verband Deutscher Alten und Behindertenhilfe and CarePool Hannover, Case T-69/18, hereinafter “Achema” and “Verband Deutscher Alten”), which provide further guidance on the standard of judicial review of Commission decisions not to raise objections at the end of the preliminary examination phase (see Article 4(3) of Regulation 2015/1589, OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, pp. 9-29, the “State aid Procedural Regulation”). Before describing some of the relevant takeaways of the judgments from the viewpoint of the State aid rules, it is useful to briefly outline the background of the cases. Achema (Case T-300/19) concerned aid measures adopted by Lithuania to support producers of electricity from renewable

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)
  • Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)

Quotation

Francesco Pili, Markus Wellinger, The EU General Court provides further guidance on the standard of judicial review of Commission decisions not to raise objections at the end of a preliminary examination phase (Achema / Lifosa) (Verband Deutscher Alten), 14 April 2021, e-Competitions June 2021, Art. N° 100861

Visites 117

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues