The US Supreme Court states that a federal court is not bound by the official interpretation of the foreign law even if it is relevant (Animal science products / Hebei welcome pharmaceutical)

Supreme Court Clarifies Deference Owed a Foreign Government* In a decision that will have a significant impact on antitrust enforcement, particularly private damages actions against international cartels, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that a federal court considering a case in which foreign law is relevant is not bound to defer to an official interpretation of the law offered by the foreign government. The decision is Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., No. 16-1220. “A federal court should accord respectful consideration to a foreign government’s submission, but is not bound to accord conclusive effect to the foreign government’s

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Wolters Kluwer (Riverwoods)

Quotation

Jeffrey May, The US Supreme Court states that a federal court is not bound by the official interpretation of the foreign law even if it is relevant (Animal science products / Hebei welcome pharmaceutical), 14 June 2018, e-Competitions June 2018, Art. N° 88761

Visites 108

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues