The US Supreme Court accepts a claim as the opportunity to revisit its rules on antitrust claims by indirect purchaser (Apple / Pepper)

On June 18, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court accepted Apple’s petition for certiorari in Apple Inc. v. Pepper, [1] appealing the Ninth Circuit’s decision that Apple is, by contract, the exclusive distributor of iPhone applications (“apps”) through the online Apple App Store platform, from which consumers purchase app distribution services directly and therefore have standing to challenge Apple’s mandatory 30% commission on all iPhone apps. [2] The case presents a unique opportunity for the Supreme Court to revisit its holding in Illinois Brick [3] prohibiting antitrust claims by indirect purchasers and clarify the specific application of the doctrine to distribution markets—or, as the Department of Justice hinted in its amicus brief, issue a historic decision overturning the doctrine. The

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Clifford Chance (Washington D.C.)

Quotation

Michaela Spero, The US Supreme Court accepts a claim as the opportunity to revisit its rules on antitrust claims by indirect purchaser (Apple / Pepper), 18 June 2018, e-Competitions June 2018, Art. N° 90000

Visites 73

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues