Having failed at obtaining federal standing to sue for damages under one exception to the Illinois Brick rule, the plaintiffs argued in the alternative that they had standing under the “ownership/control” exception to that rule. Again, the court
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit holds direct-purchaser antitrust plaintiffs lack standing to seek damages for alleged antitrust price-fixing in the ATM services (ATM Fee)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.