The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit holds direct-purchaser antitrust plaintiffs lack standing to seek damages for alleged antitrust price-fixing in the ATM services (ATM Fee)

Richards, Douglas; Cormier, Christopher J.

Previous article The Hong Kong Parliament adopts a cross-sector competition law regime Next article The EU General Court reduces fine imposed on each undertaking in a case involving market sharing in the energy sector (GDF Suez / E.ON)

12 Jul 2012

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit holds direct-purchaser antitrust plaintiffs lack standing to seek damages for alleged antitrust price-fixing in the ATM services (ATM Fee)

KEYWORDS

Reference

US Court of Appeals for the Ninth circuit, ATM Fee, 686 F.3d 741, 12 July 2012

Having failed at obtaining federal standing to sue for damages under one exception to the Illinois Brick rule, the plaintiffs argued in the alternative that they had standing under the “ownership/control” exception to that rule. Again, the court

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

PDF Version

Authors

Douglas Richards
Cohen Milstein (Washington)

United States 57 contributions 7307 visits
Christopher J. Cormier
Burns Charest (Washington)

United States 57 contributions 7307 visits

Quotation

Douglas Richards, Christopher J. Cormier, The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit holds direct-purchaser antitrust plaintiffs lack standing to seek damages for alleged antitrust price-fixing in the ATM services (ATM Fee), 12 July 2012, e-Competitions June 2012, Art. N° 55014

Visites 144