The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rules that an association may limit the number of available scholarships and place restrictions on those awarded without committing antitrust violations in the market for scholarships granted to student athletes (Agnew / NCAA)

KEYWORDS
Reference

US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Agnew / NCAA , No. 11-3066, 18 June 2012

Many of the most impactful cases in the history of sports law are antitrust based. Those cases range from a 1920s foundational case granting baseball’s antitrust exemption to the series of landmark cases evaluating the move by the Raider’s NFL franchise back and forth between Los Angeles and Oakland, to the current day cases resolving sports league labor stoppages. The college

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School (Philadelphia)
    United States 1 contribution 131 visits

Quotation

Kenneth L. Shropshire, The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rules that an association may limit the number of available scholarships and place restrictions on those awarded without committing antitrust violations in the market for scholarships granted to student athletes (Agnew / NCAA), 18 June 2012, e-Competitions June 2012, Art. N° 62471

Visites 131

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues